| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 |
41. Anchoring Skill - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Quantum Gopher on 28/09/2003 12:22:42 Actually, I think them giant secures work better as temporary storage while the indy collects from them and flies back to a station to make a deposit. They work best as part of a large operatio...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.09.28 12:18:00
|
42. Assets window wont close...... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Are we keeping our caches nice and clean? (does that even help in these cases?) Q. Gopher __________ I know...it's only ROCK and roll, but I like it!!
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.09.28 12:10:00
|
43. [Soapbox] Player-owned property and the future of EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why not allow the controlling power of a player owned station to hire npc mercenaries to enforce the peace in non-Concorde controlled space. Security levels would mean squat. Only agressors would be attacked. Of course there's the problem of the c...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.09.27 11:37:00
|
44. Griefing, Pirating and EVE. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: What's this crap with pod killing anyway? Yes, it was quite a setback before cloning was introduced. But now, podding someone will set them back what, 150k? Big deal when you just blew their Battleship up. I think it's called "Add...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.09.06 19:32:00
|
45. To CCP/GMs: Bann this player from playing eve anymore - Please. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
IMHO: Naming yourself and acting like a player character (drone) in order to trick a player and get the game mechanics to kill said player should be bannable. Just as naming yourself as a GM and/or acting like a game master in order to influenc...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.20 04:47:00
|
46. That sticky about attacking the GMs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I don't think ANY player should be able to create a name with GM as the first two letters. I think any player that isn't a GM that has GM in the front of their name should be banned as they are obviously trying to impersonate a Game Master. I'v...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.18 14:29:00
|
47. That sticky about attacking the GMs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Quantum Gopher on 18/08/2003 14:09:02 Quote: Edited by: slacker on 18/08/2003 13:55:18 Quote: They are there to do a job, not play the game. If you interfere with them, you risk repercussions. In short, don't attack...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.18 14:02:00
|
48. That sticky about attacking the GMs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Quantum Gopher on 18/08/2003 13:57:29 The way I read the "Attacking GMs Message": They are there to do a job, not play the game. If you interfere with them, you risk repercussions. In short, don't attack them. It would also probabl...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.18 13:50:00
|
49. About the Item hangar... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think allowing us to create "filter tabs" in our station inventory would go a long way in making things easier. That way we can choose what we want to see or not to see. The main view being "All", right click on the top of the inventory window....
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.16 16:01:00
|
50. Don't you think it's about time to remove the NPC pirates from Gates? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think to be more in accordance with "gaming reality", npc pirates and npc police (Concord, Navy etc.) should not both be present at gates. The two obviously opposite (say that three times fast) sides should not be ignoring each other. IMHO Q....
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.16 15:51:00
|
51. Giant secure containers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I like the thought of a true Cargo Train. Have the "engine" ships (cargo tow?) latch onto the containers, perhaps even have a friend attach his engine to help out if the mass of all the containers is too much to handle well (more engines = faster...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.15 17:55:00
|
52. What will be done to stop container abuse? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
How about Concord Salvage Operations? Cans left in space unused for a certain number of hours/days could be "salvaged" by Concord employees (either actual ships or during server down) and held at the nearest appropriate Concord facility for picku...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.12 20:17:00
|
53. Introduction of Miner II's... WHAT THE HECK? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Imagine the fury if the two entities that owned the Tech 5 mining lasers were actually able to reverse engineer them and make them available on the market for even more than 5.5 million. We'd see complaints about that too, I'm sure. 5.5 million...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.10 17:38:00
|
54. ECM use is now an offensive action - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: " Say I'm flying my indy towards a gate. A known pirate locks onto me. I use a module to break his target lock. Concord warps in and blows me up and the pirate collects the loot, no shots fired." Well, duh. Why don't you wait until h...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.09 18:56:00
|
55. ECM use is now an offensive action - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Quantum Gopher on 09/08/2003 18:49:49 Ok...let's see here... Say I'm flying my indy towards a gate. A known pirate locks onto me. I use a module to break his target lock. Concord warps in and blows me up and the pirate collects the...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.09 18:43:00
|
56. The Nieblung Mining laser. How it came into the game from the person that put it there. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tech 5 mining lasers as default Jovian equipment... *sigh* I think I need an operation...perhaps some DNA...maybe some implants..? Q. Gopher __________ I know...it's only ROCK and roll, but I like it!!
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.07 18:56:00
|
57. To nerf? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
nerf: A term usually related to making something dangerous or difficult less so. A common culture term in the computer industry -- Also the trademark of a toy company. spam: A term referring to unwanted or unsolicited messages and advertisements...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.07 17:37:00
|
58. To nerf? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
nerf: A term usually related to making something dangerous or difficult less so. A common culture term in the computer industry -- Also the trademark of a toy company. spam: A term referring to unwanted or unsolicited messages and advertisements...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.07 17:37:00
|
59. Wars - Quick question - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
But think of the potential to exploit corporate wars. A pirate corp could simply declare war on their victims and get away with killing them anywhere...or anyone could for that matter. If corporations don't accept war declarations, there should a...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.07 12:02:00
|
60. Exploitng using secure cargo containers. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Quantum Gopher on 06/08/2003 15:34:30 I believe that the person who jettisons a secure container is listed as the owner when the can's info is viewed. This would mean that the person who has action taken against them for exploiting...
- by Quantum Gopher - at 2003.08.06 15:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |